Forum Posts

Raihan Ali
Jul 07, 2022
In Interior Design Forum
The Second Paragraph of Article 195, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code Stipulates: “Anyone Whose Reputation Has Been Violated May Also Request an Appropriate Punishment for Restoration of His Reputation.” as for What Constitutes an "Appropriate Punishment for Restoration of Reputation", Judicial Practice Has Developed a "Mandatory Apology", Which Requires the Perpetrator of the Infringement of the Right of Reputation to Publicly Express the Meaning of Apology in His Own Name. It May Be a Newspaper, or It May Be Posting the Court-Requested Apology on His Facebook and Ig. an Apology Should Have Been Willingly; but a Forced custom t shirts Apology May Not. Will Use the Court Judgment to Request, Often Unwilling, Often Forced to Apologize. Interpretation of Shizi No. 656 in the Past, the Justices Made a Constitutional Interpretation in Interpretation No. 656, and Held That: If the Perpetrator Is Ordered to Publicly Apologize by the Judgment, and There Is No Such Thing as Self-Humiliation of the Perpetrator That Undermines Human Dignity, It Is Not Unconstitutional. Although This Interpretation Is Constitutional, It Also Adds a Premise That "It Does Not Involve Those Who Harm the Human Dignity, Such as the Self-Humiliation of the Perpetrator." It Is Just That the Justices Did Not Make It Clear What Kind of Compulsory Apology Is Considered to Make the Perpetrator Self-Humiliate and What Constitutes Damage to Human Dignity. Therefore, Judicial Practice Will Continue to Use the Method of Compulsory Apology as One of the Ways to Restore the Reputation and Appropriate Punishment. in October 2018, the Justices Accepted the Compulsory Apology Case Again, and Held a Public Briefing in March of the Following Year. on February 25, 2022, the Constitutional Court Ruled,
0
0
2
 

Raihan Ali

More actions